4 ms·
It’s easy to implement, the reason it’s not more popular is because services are including support for other 2FA options, and users pick the path of least resis
by albertgoeswoof 3y ago
It’s easy to implement, the reason it’s not more popular is because services are including support for other 2FA options, and users pick the path of least resistance.
I wrote about this here https://blog.mailpace.com/blog/why-we-use-webauthn-for-2fa/ https://blog.mailpace.com/blog/why-we-use-webauthn-for-2fa/
In short, we should implement webauthn, and only webauthn for 2FA