4 ms·
While your advice is generally sound, I'm concerned about the implied exhortation to self-censorship of controversial, but legitimate, views that it carries wit
by redthrowaway 15y ago
While your advice is generally sound, I'm concerned about the implied exhortation to self-censorship of controversial, but legitimate, views that it carries with it. Really, 20 years from now, if they're doing those kinds of background checks, will the checker care more that the checkee trolled some RIP group, or espoused support for Wikileaks? Will they care more that the checkee called someone "a fucking retard" on the comments of a blog post, or that they wrote a post arguing in favor of fighting back against cops who attack citizens?
Ultimately, the obnoxious-but-innocuous comments are just noise; it's the political views that run counter to the mainstream that will raise the most flags, and which require the most freedom from censorship, self- or otherwise.
- rdouble 15y agoEach checker will not do the digging themselves, rather, companies like Palantir will offer info products like "Individual Troll Quotient" or "Online Political Summary" which will be used in the same way credit profiles are for lending. This already exists above board with systems like Klout, and in the background a number of companies sell services like these to marketers.