9 ms·
Indeed. That's the point here. Russia was high up on the axis of overall innovation. But by adopting the bolshevist/communistic terror system, the direction of
by waihtis 4y ago
Indeed. That's the point here. Russia was high up on the axis of overall innovation. But by adopting the bolshevist/communistic terror system, the direction of progress was permanently set into a downward direction. It is a loss for all of humanity at 100% certainty.
- larry_ralph_ 4y agoEvery single of the innovations the OP listed was attained under "the bolshevist/communistic terror system". Prior to the 1917 Revolution, Imperial Russia was an Agricultural backwater that was widely derided as the least industrialized part of Europe. Honest question: Don't they teach history in school these days? The level of ignorance displayed in some of the comments in this thread is staggering.
- waihtis 4y agoHilarious. Are you advocating the Soviet Union was a progressive nation?
- larry_ralph_ 4y agoI understand. You literally don't know what else to say, so you have to at least attempt to say something that you think might sound witty. A real pity. And yes, compared to Imperial Russia that was a Near-Absolute Monarchy with an Hereditary Emperor whose imperial style/form of address was "Emperor and Autocrat of All the Russias" the Soviet Union was a beacon of progressiveness.