4 ms·
You're missing the point. An increase in the number of mammalian herbivores just means an increased point of equilibrium for methane. But there will still be an
by ftrobro 3y ago
You're missing the point. An increase in the number of mammalian herbivores just means an increased point of equilibrium for methane. But there will still be an equilibrium.
In contrast, using fossile sources of carbon (oil etc) will increase the greenhouse effect every year even if the usage is constant.
- thfuran 3y agoAnd you seem to be missing the point that increasing the equilibrium concentration of atmospheric methane is something we very much do not want to do. And that agriculture isn't actually a closed loop.