5 ms·
According to your logic then, science should not have been able to advance at all from the very beginning
by adammarples 4y ago
According to your logic then, science should not have been able to advance at all from the very beginning
- slibhb 4y agoThe idealistic view of scientists as unbiased arbiters is just not true. Science advances because: 1. Some of the time, scientists behave in an objective manner 2. Theories that are correct have predictive power and are therefore useful (i.e. get results, enable new technologies) and therefore tend to win out 3. "Science advances one funeral at a time" -Max Planck
- fooker 4y agoThere’s a cynical notion that science advances one funeral at a time, attributed to Max Planck. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_principle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_principle