> through prompt engineering and other techniques, you can produce neutrally-written text Through thinking and editing, humans can (and often do) produce neutr

> through prompt engineering and other techniques, you can produce neutrally-written text Through thinking and editing, humans can (and often do) produce neutrally written text. What does AI change? Also, who decides what's neutral? The AI's programmers and operators - humans. Who decides if your AI's output is neutral - you do. Why couldn't you do the same with a human writer? > Even if NewsNotFound articles are only 90% neutral, that's 90% BETTER than reading the same story from a sensationalist source. Nothing is 100% sensationalistic. Anyway, I can (and do) find endless non-sensationalistic news. AI changes nothing; you are an editor (which is a good thing to be - I wish you well). But the idea that AI is somehow more neutral than humans, or that humans aren't in control here, is very dangerous. That is my concern.