4 ms·
Why does it need to be non-destructive?
by sfpotter 4y ago
Why does it need to be non-destructive?
- spacemadness 4y agoWell, I guess people can start burning peoples houses down, but I am going to go out on a limb and say that’s probably not an ideal solution.
- sfpotter 4y agoI’m assuming there’s a productive middle ground between “do nothing destructive” and “burn people’s houses down”.
- spacemadness 4y agoI’m not disagreeing. I think you’re putting more work on “non-destructive” than was intended. I mean it in the literal sense of property destruction and the like. I’m not lumping in protest as destructive or legislation that forces a lower gains on housing. I mean destruction born out of pure political frustration of the revolutionary type.
- pjdkoch 4y agoFires are pretty, at a distance.