2 ms·

This is referring to how the open-sourced code provides the freedom for anyone to criticise or correct the way the site works through contribution. Also, LLMs

This is referring to how the open-sourced code provides the freedom for anyone to criticise or correct the way the site works through contribution. Also, LLMs are biased, but through prompt engineering and other techniques, you can produce neutrally-written text. I realise now that my messaging with this project is off. What would more accurately explain the purpose of this project is to reduce the effects of sensationalism and indoctrination in the news. In other words, provide a platform for readers to make up their own opinions on news stories by filtering out the positive/negative language and putting as much focus on facts as possible. Even if NewsNotFound articles are only 90% neutral, that's 90% BETTER than reading the same story from a sensationalist source.

wolverine876 3y ago
> through prompt engineering and other techniques, you can produce neutrally-written text Through thinking and editing, humans can (and often do) produce neutrally written text. What does AI change? Also, who decides what's neutral? The AI's programmers and operators - humans. Who decides if your AI's output is neutral - you do. Why couldn't you do the same with a human writer? > Even if NewsNotFound articles are only 90% neutral, that's 90% BETTER than reading the same story from a sensationalist source. Nothing is 100% sensationalistic. Anyway, I can (and do) find endless non-sensationalistic news. AI changes nothing; you are an editor (which is a good thing to be - I wish you well). But the idea that AI is somehow more neutral than humans, or that humans aren't in control here, is very dangerous. That is my concern.