3 ms·
Good question. I've no idea but if I was the author I wouldn't bother with concurrency, I'd assume single user only and always; a database without concurrency i
by _a_a_a_ 4y ago
Good question. I've no idea but if I was the author I wouldn't bother with concurrency, I'd assume single user only and always; a database without concurrency is still perfectly good database so it's hardly making the book title a lie.
- anonymousDan 4y agoHave to disagree, concurrent transaction processing is super interesting.
- _a_a_a_ 4y agoSure it's interesting! Maybe a bit much to load on beginners though? Maybe the author can say.