3 ms·
Sig Sauer claim that it has an internal safety (or really, a couple internal safeties). Part of the problem is that people are choosing to carry a gun that is
by maxerickson 4y ago
Sig Sauer claim that it has an internal safety (or really, a couple internal safeties).
Part of the problem is that people are choosing to carry a gun that is 'ready to fire' (like, they want it live as they remove it from a holster...). It's hard for me to get into the mindset of a civilian that chambers a round in their bedroom as they get ready to leave the house, so I wouldn't want to try to speak to how informed their choice is.
- jaclaz 4y agoI don't know, I am not a gun owner, let alone an expert, but "old" guns (like the Colt .45/M1911) had AFAIK both a thumb and a grip safety[0], and (say) Beretta 92's had a thumb safety and in order to arm the hammer[1] the trigger needed "full travel", both seem to me like much safer than these "new" guns (against accidental firing). [0] and additionally you had to arm the hammer [1] unless manually armed