4 ms·
It really seems like a trade off. Animals seem “happy” and “free” out in nature, but are they? They have to be on guard every single second because something m
by meken 3y ago
It really seems like a trade off. Animals seem “happy” and “free” out in nature, but are they?
They have to be on guard every single second because something might eat them. If they get injured, that is an absolute death sentence. There is no safety net. They have to weather harsh weather conditions. They are at risk for being eaten alive and enduring a slow agonizing painful death by other animals that do not care one iota about their well-being
At least in captivity they are safe. I don’t see how we as humans are all that different in how most of us choose to live our lives
- yunohn 3y agoThis is a fundamentally misguided take. An equivalent comparison would be jailing all humans to keep them safe from each other. Humans having a home for occasional safety from environmental hazards is not the same as free-flying birds being caged in isolation forever.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]