2 ms·
Sure, why not? IMO an employer should have a greater responsibility to its employees and its customers than to its investors. There is a differences between "n
by UncleMeat 4y ago
Sure, why not? IMO an employer should have a greater responsibility to its employees and its customers than to its investors.
There is a differences between "not important" and "not the most efficient way to increase shareholder value." Corporations regularly refuse to do work that I'd consider important as a customer because their investors don't see it as important.