3 ms·
Or, 2,000 years ago - if by “all living people” you mean everyone alive right now. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/humans-are-all-more-closely-relat
by irrational 4y ago
Or, 2,000 years ago - if by “all living people” you mean everyone alive right now.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/humans-are-all-more-closely-related-than-we-commonly-think/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/humans-are-all-mo...
- denton-scratch 4y agoOh, that's interesting. My father researched a family tree; not rigorously, like Mormons do, but he spent about a decade tramping around the country, visiting graveyards and inspecting parish records. I have a bound volume of the tree. He claimed descent from (a) William The Conqueror, (b) Lady Godiva, and (c) Charlemagne. I don't have his records, only the tree. The links are pretty ropey, especially when you reach further back. And he imported big chunks of it from trees built by others. His conclusions seem pretty implausible, but that article makes them seem a bit more plausible.