3 ms·
Your example of Hare suggests Intel was sleeping. I don't think they were. And no, TSMC is staying steady no matter what. That's how they've been operating fro
by re-thc 4y ago
Your example of Hare suggests Intel was sleeping. I don't think they were.
And no, TSMC is staying steady no matter what. That's how they've been operating from the start - regardless of if the "opponent" is making mistakes. It's not a strategy in that sense where they're competing. They're doing their own thing and the competitors either died by themselves or failed.
They're not competitive as in they aren't competing with Intel. Otherwise they'd go for counter measures or what not. That's never been their strategy. Cutting edge wasn't their core business originally.
- diceduckmonk 4y agoCompetitive in economics and the market means they can provide a good at a lower price than competitors. Either TSMC has no competitors, or they are beating them. If they don’t have competitors, it’s a sign other newcomers can’t compete, so they’re still competitive.
- re-thc 4y agoThat's like saying if everyone fails an exam and 1 student failed a bit less that they're great or that public transport in American is great because there's none in the Amazon Forest. IF we go at it that way everyone is competitive - just label the target market differently and claim to be on top / no competitors.