4 ms·
Sundar was chosen following a series of failures by megalomaniacal executives Larry had appointed/approved to head various departments, including Andy Rubin, To
by Fricken 4y ago
Sundar was chosen following a series of failures by megalomaniacal executives Larry had appointed/approved to head various departments, including Andy Rubin, Tony Fadell, and Anthony Levandwoski. Sundar was a move in the opposite direction.
- morelisp 4y agoDon't forget Vic. It's somewhat amazing how many failed, some nearly sociopathic, almost-CEOs Google had.
- sangnoir 4y agoIronically, Vic was was empowered to counter a similar panic an upstart more formidable than OpenAI. He brought a bold vision alright, but that's not sufficient to be a good leader.
- retrocryptid 4y agoAren't CEOs supposed to be sociopaths? (Asking for a friend.)
- raverbashing 4y agoUgh Overly opinionated people like that could thrive under Jobs, who was the biggest opinion setter, which made them fight for the most important things while getting a pushback on the most controversial areas and not waste time with minor stuff Take that and they start going crazy (yes I'm talking about Johnny Ive)