3 ms·
I don't know, I would consider it lazy to write off the political structure coordinating over a billion people as "inferior" when it seems to be working for the
by shadowgovt 4y ago
I don't know, I would consider it lazy to write off the political structure coordinating over a billion people as "inferior" when it seems to be working for them. I have no disagreement that authoritarians tend to massage and hide data more (as opposed to liberal democracies, where we just classify it and throw people in jail for dumping those databases, right?), but I observe the way the world works and conclude the jury is currently out on which solution leads to a more stable society in the long term. China's communist experiment is young, but it's grounded in political philosophy and theories of social structure dating back thousands of years... I'll let America get a couple more hundred under its belt before I conclude this Democratic experiment is working.
History suggests previous attempts at democracies were unstable. Maybe the alchemy was right this go around. But I'm watching this one allow itself to be spun up into division and polarization that has resulted in a civil war in the past, so we'll see how it goes. The house has a tendency to win, especially when the house is time herself.
- clouddrover 4y ago> I don't know Yes, but don't worry. I do. > I would consider it lazy to write off the political structure coordinating over a billion people You're not considering anything. You're only desperately trying to hold on to a losing proposition you've arrived at through a lack of principle, a profound laziness, and a basic nihilism. > I'll let America get a couple more hundred under its belt before I conclude this Democratic experiment is working. Such sloppy thinking. You really do need to broaden your horizons.