4 ms·

I think that makes sense. Because the difficulty and challenge of coding is not so much the code, but the understanding of requirements. No-Code solves the cod

I think that makes sense. Because the difficulty and challenge of coding is not so much the code, but the understanding of requirements. No-Code solves the coding part but you still need to be able to express the requirements, which is difficult for someone who doesn't have the thought process of a coder. ChatGPT also solves the requirements part in that you can speak in English and be vague and (if you're lucky) it understands what you mean, just as a senior coder might.

juliendorra 3y ago
And that means that expressing requirements to chatGPT is not easier than expressing them to a human professional. Which is hard. And prone to misunderstanding, re-explanations, back and forth. Formalisms and modelisation have been invented (even before computers, eg. blueprints or paper forms) to simplify expressing requirements and make communication about problems and solution better. Natural language is a worse way of expressing intent and complex needs that other forms of UIs. It has the benefit of plasticity, but is really bad at discoverability, consistency, least-surprise, recognition vs. recall, and many other important aspect of an effective, leveraging UI.