> No, I’m saying having a finite number of neurons doesn’t imply a particular number of brain states. But of course it does imply that. It's vast but necessari

> No, I’m saying having a finite number of neurons doesn’t imply a particular number of brain states. But of course it does imply that. It's vast but necessarily finite number of "brain states" however that's defined, which is itself a subset of the vast but also finite number of states of the finite number of component particles.