4 ms·
He's compensate to maximize shareholder returns, not to keep people in a job. The people are employed for the same reason and when their RoI is below the thresh
by sys_64738 4y ago
He's compensate to maximize shareholder returns, not to keep people in a job. The people are employed for the same reason and when their RoI is below the threshold then you need to right the ship. This is what a CEO is partly there to do.
- malermeister 4y agoWhich, while true, is a really shitty system, as evidenced by the headline.
- fourseventy 4y agoThe employees were paid for their work. It's a business not a charity.
- malermeister 4y agoAgain, not the point. I get that is how the system currently works. Point is, it shouldn't be.
- Zetice 4y agoIt’s a lot less shitty than everything else we’ve tried, it’s not like we know of a better way to run an economy…