3 ms·
Zuckerberg took "full responsibility" in the last round of failures too. Though he isn't injecting his money back into the company. Full responsibility, but n
by rvnx 4y ago
Zuckerberg took "full responsibility" in the last round of failures too.
Though he isn't injecting his money back into the company.
Full responsibility, but not too much.
- josephd79 4y agoHe also took millions why firing thousands of people.
- serial_dev 4y agoTalk is cheap. "Taking full responsibility" is also cheap, that's why CEOs often do it and fire 5-20% of their staff without blinking an eye.
- lupire 4y agoThe stock price is his full responsibility.
- jstummbillig 4y agoHow did you get from "taking all the risk" to "taking full responsibility"? Both mean entirely different things and you can easily have one without the other. i.e. a lead surgeon can and should take "full responsibility" for what happens in the OR, but they obviously neither can nor will (and I also don't think should) shoulder "all the risk" for what happens in the OR (or even most of it).