>Gold didn't reach its current adoption over 1000 years. I didn't say it did, you seem to have misread my post. >It always had the current adoption rate. >Th

>Gold didn't reach its current adoption over 1000 years. I didn't say it did, you seem to have misread my post. >It always had the current adoption rate. >The % of people who want to own gold was near 100% even thousands of years ago. I dont know how you could possibly make a claim like this and defend it. Source?