3 ms·
I benchmarked both with a cross platform program. btrfs is massively slower on windows, especially with random IO (but also with sequential). Its even more disp
by brucethemoose2 4y ago
I benchmarked both with a cross platform program. btrfs is massively slower on windows, especially with random IO (but also with sequential). Its even more disparate with compression turned on both.
I cant remember the linux results... not that it matters, as I avoid NTFS writes on linux like the plague, even with the new kernel driver. Just this year, I tried trusting it for a little while, and linux ntfs killed an entire backup HDD by corrupting the partition table :/.
Mounting NTFS as read only is OK though.