2 ms·
"Emissions going down is the right track" Emissions are NOT going down, full stop. At this point it's clear you are arguing in bad faith, so I'm done. 20 years
by jshen 3y ago
"Emissions going down is the right track"
Emissions are NOT going down, full stop. At this point it's clear you are arguing in bad faith, so I'm done. 20 years ago people made the exact same dishonest arguments you are now, that over a few data points temperatures stopped going up, climate change was over! Every time there's a La Nina the same bad faith argument returns. In 5 years when it's clear that what you've said is wrong, you'll move on to some other bad faith argument like they did. I've seen the pattern over and over again over the last 25 years.
The evidence I've provided is clear, and I'm confident that anyone with more than two brain cells that reads it will see the obvious reality that it illustrates.
- wilg 3y agoIt's not bad faith, you're literally just not responding to what I'm saying! Only one of the metrics I brought up (actual global temperature) could even be affected by La Nina. And I'm not saying it isn't affected by it. It seems like its easier for you to pretend I'm some kind of global warming denier than to actually engage with what I'm saying. It's fascinating psychologically, but obviously we're not having a productive conversation. I hope you're able in the future to look at this stuff with clearer eyes. It doesn't seem like you'll be very helpful in solving this problem if this is how you approach it.