Apparently, it’s reducing that individuals are what they are, because of the circumstances that created them (like root cause analysis). This is in contrast t

Apparently, it’s reducing that individuals are what they are, because of the circumstances that created them (like root cause analysis). This is in contrast to assigning some other factor that may be that might be too paternalistic, too taboo or too “blamey” to consider (like incompetence or a lack of spirituality/belief). It’s a bit of a mindfuck for me, because how else are you going to explain a given situation without looking at the factors that created them.