His thinking seems much clearer than most of the discourse around this technology. But I think that a better way of thinking about these systems is an imperfec

His thinking seems much clearer than most of the discourse around this technology. But I think that a better way of thinking about these systems is an imperfect world model analogy. Not a made-of-people analogy. These models are not made of people. People helped gathering data about the world around us. And that data allowed to build a world model. Which includes models of people, along with everything else. And it’s a world model, not a human civilization model. Data goes through the funnel of The Pile and the likes, but ultimately the predictive model is of the universe, not that of humans.