> In these cases, copyright will only protect the human-authored aspects of the work, which are “independent of” and do “not affect” the copyright status of the

> In these cases, copyright will only protect the human-authored aspects of the work, which are “independent of” and do “not affect” the copyright status of the AI-generated material itself.[35] It still sounds like there could be cases where a company only has copyright to a part of their own source code. How would outsiders even be aware of what has copyright and what doesn't in this situation? If an entire function was created via AI is that function then fair game for others to use as well?