4 ms·
In spirit I agree, but I think you picked a bad example. With just version 3.5 I got these. They aren't cherry-picked, I just massaged the responses with a litt
by batch12 4y ago
In spirit I agree, but I think you picked a bad example. With just version 3.5 I got these. They aren't cherry-picked, I just massaged the responses with a little back-and-forth (funnier and punnier) Here are the first 5.
Bun-believable! These Hot Buns Will Have You Saying 'Oh Doughn't Mind If I Do'"
"Hot Buns: The Yeast You Can Do for Your Taste Buds"
"Bake Your Day with These Hot Buns: The Roll-ly Grail of Breakfast Treats"
"Raisin the Bar: How to Make Hot Cross Buns that are Bun-derfully Delicious"
"Don't Be Alarmed, These Hot Buns are Oven-tually Going to Be Your Favorites"
A compromise is that your prompt has to be creative.. so a human is still in the loop for now..
- LanceH 4y agoOn the plus side, it probably delivers on time.
- 10xDev 4y agoI think you missed the point. They quoted an advert involving a pun because it was creative, you are just showing results because it includes puns as a response. Most of those are used or subpar.
- batch12 4y agoYeah, it's very possible I missed the point. I think though that most publications will settle for something that's good enough. They don't need (or can't afford) Steinbeck headlines, so they'll go the easiest and cheapest route. I didn't personally find the original headline any better than the generated ones, but maybe I don't have as refined a palate as you do. Thanks for the feedback.
- xereeto 4y agoThese are all very simple low hanging fruit puns. None of these come close to the human example. That said, I'm not an idiot - AI will get there and probably soon.
- jgalt212 4y agounless we encounter a devil's staircase.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]