4 ms·

Oh, politics understands that alright, don't you worry about that. Politicians are the enemies of privacy for the masses, because a transparent population is a

Oh, politics understands that alright, don't you worry about that. Politicians are the enemies of privacy for the masses, because a transparent population is a population that is easier controlled and manipulated. That's also why terms are being used deliberately incorrectly, to move legitimate positions nearer to criminal activity. Just ask anyone interested in hobbyist chemistry.

whydoyoucare 4y ago
[flagged]
- andrekandre 4y ago
  > That way build sympathy for the law-breakers how do you build sympathy for law-breakers...? i'm having a hard time understating...
  - deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]
- eigen 4y ago
  > 1984. I think it was 1986, as in the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. [1] > That way build sympathy for the law-breakers, then legitimize them via immigration reforms that only benefit the illegals it was noted "The legalization provisions in this act will go far to improve the lives of a class of individuals who now must hide in the shadows, without access to many of the benefits of a free and open society. Very soon many of these men and women will be able to step into the sunlight and, ultimately, if they choose, they may become Americans" 1. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/99/s1200 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/99/s1200
  - tastyfreeze 4y ago
    I don't really care if somebody entered the country legally or not. Eventually, everybody assimilates. However, I am not ok extending benefits paid for by taxes to non-citizens. As long as there are politicians trying to give tax paid benefits to "illegal" immigrants I will be against illegal immigration.
- kelnos 4y ago
  The term "illegal aliens" is an invention. "Immigrant" doesn't care about legality; it is literally just someone who has moved from another locale. Labeling one variant "legal" and another "illegal" is perfectly reasonable.

whydoyoucare 4y ago

[flagged]

andrekandre 4y ago
> That way build sympathy for the law-breakers how do you build sympathy for law-breakers...? i'm having a hard time understating...
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
eigen 4y ago
> 1984. I think it was 1986, as in the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. [1] > That way build sympathy for the law-breakers, then legitimize them via immigration reforms that only benefit the illegals it was noted "The legalization provisions in this act will go far to improve the lives of a class of individuals who now must hide in the shadows, without access to many of the benefits of a free and open society. Very soon many of these men and women will be able to step into the sunlight and, ultimately, if they choose, they may become Americans" 1. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/99/s1200 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/99/s1200
- tastyfreeze 4y ago
  I don't really care if somebody entered the country legally or not. Eventually, everybody assimilates. However, I am not ok extending benefits paid for by taxes to non-citizens. As long as there are politicians trying to give tax paid benefits to "illegal" immigrants I will be against illegal immigration.
kelnos 4y ago
The term "illegal aliens" is an invention. "Immigrant" doesn't care about legality; it is literally just someone who has moved from another locale. Labeling one variant "legal" and another "illegal" is perfectly reasonable.