It's great that they've removed "non-permissive" (GPL) code from their training data, but it looks like they still train on code with "permissive" licenses (the

It's great that they've removed "non-permissive" (GPL) code from their training data, but it looks like they still train on code with "permissive" licenses (they use MIT, BSD, Apache as examples). But don't these permissive licenses still require the copyright notice to be reproduced? From the MIT license: > The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. From the BSD licenses: > Redistribution and use in source and binary forms are permitted provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are duplicated in all such forms... From the Apache 2.0 license: > You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works