> You know we can see your comments, right? Yes, I do. > And you've got a… distinct… writing style Ad hominem is not as good an argument as you think it is.

> You know we can see your comments, right? Yes, I do. > And you've got a… distinct… writing style Ad hominem is not as good an argument as you think it is. So. This is what I actually wrote, and not what you pretend I wrote. The original statement was this: "If you push for renewables instead of wasting money on over due and over budget nuclear reactors" To which I replied: "Almost three-quarters of hydropower, water, coal and nuclear infrastructure projects were over budget by 49% on average" Which means only one thing: renewable projects are just as prone to time and buget overruns as nuclear. That is it. How you imagined what you think I wrote, I cannot even begin to comprehend.