> Someone from France is telling you that actually, it's really not that great... That person is really just spreading FUD: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?i

> Someone from France is telling you that actually, it's really not that great... That person is really just spreading FUD: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35659262 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35659262 > How many times do people need to be told that with all the renewables coming onto the grid, we don't need more base load? Of course we do > We need storage. Yes. And it's non-existent. There are literally no grid-scale strage solutions in existence. > Do any of you geniuses realize that it's a lot more difficult for the grid to accommodate the injection of tens of gigawatts of power, than it is to handle tens of gigawatts of highly distributed generation and storage across a large region? Neither are particularly true statements. Also, what do you think grid-scale storage would do if not inject gigawatts of power into a grid when needed? > Nuclear capacity takes a minimum of ten years, more like 20, Fuqing Nuclear Power Plant in China: 6.1 GW nameplate capacity. Built over 14 years at 1 reactor per 6 years. Operational. Meanwhile the very distributed Xlinks Morocco-UK Power Project was founded in 2018, and is promised to start powering Britain in 2030. --- start quote --- Of the megaprojects surveyed, 64% were delayed and 57% were over budget. https://www.offshorewind.biz/2016/12/02/offshore-wind-projects-have-less-delays-and-cost-overruns-says-ey/ https://www.offshorewind.biz/2016/12/02/offshore-wind-projec... --- end quote --- So we know how that will go. > Nuclear plants require a continuous, expensive, complicated supply chain and hundreds of people supervising and maintaining it. > The panels last for decades, and can be recycled. Wind turbines require more maintenance but it's standard industrial electrical/mechanical stuff, just on a tall stick. Of course it's not just a tal stick. It's a rather complicated machine that you can't even safely get to since it's so tall. And that's before we start talking about offshore wind farms like Hornsea 2. Yo need a lot of specialist equipment to maintain those. There are 500 to 800 people working on a nuclear power plant. --- start quote --- Each windfarm tends to have between 7 and 11 employees per 100 MW https://graham.umich.edu/media/pubs/Wind-Turbine-Economic-Impact-Local-Employment-46932.pdf https://graham.umich.edu/media/pubs/Wind-Turbine-Economic-Im... --- end quote --- So while fewer than per a nuclear plant, you still have to keep in mind that you need to massively overbuild renewables because their generation fluctuates.