> He built that $500B company. Its existence is primarily due to him. He still owns the majority of it. He calls the shots on what that company does, that is th

> He built that $500B company. Its existence is primarily due to him. He still owns the majority of it. He calls the shots on what that company does, that is the end of it. If we transpose this to the medieval period, you could say the same thing about many kings who built their kingdoms by invading their neighbours. The problem, as others have pointed out, is that the number of stakeholders is huge. Some people make their living on Meta's platform so his decisions can have far-reaching consequences. I would argue that Meta should never have been allowed to get this big in the first place. Allowing the Instagram and WhatsApp acquisitions was a mistake.