8 ms·
So the Texas Senate just passed a bill that makes it more likely that Texas faculty hires will be from a smaller and no doubt lower quality pool of candidates?
by satysin 3y ago
So the Texas Senate just passed a bill that makes it more likely that Texas faculty hires will be from a smaller and no doubt lower quality pool of candidates?
Why take a job without the possibility of tenure vs anywhere else in the US that has the option available to you?
- Fauntleroy 3y ago[flagged]
- mkl95 3y agoIf you don't plan on staying in academia forever, tenure vs no tenure shouldn't really matter.
- bsder 3y agoTenure matters if you happen to be teaching American history and have a bunch of people who want you fired because you had the temerity to talk about slavery. Tenure matters if you happen to be teaching English literature and have a bunch of people who want you fired because you have the temerity to point out that Chaucer's characters have the symptoms of syphilis. Tenure matters if you happen to be teaching biology and have a bunch of people who want you fired because you had the temerity to teach about DNA and evolution. Shall I continue? Yes, there is enough oversupply of PhDs that Texas will still fill the roles. They'll just have to fill them over and over as people will leave the first chance they get.
- drstewart 3y ago[flagged]
- natpalmer1776 3y agoI'm tired of responding to folks caught up on the wrong shit, so here's what I should have said in the first place: In my personal experience I've seen or heard of more professors espousing their personal views as fact than most online and academic discourse would have otherwise led me to believe possible. I think removing tenure is a net loss for research because professors now have to worry about politically motivated reprisal for their research, whereas I believe it to be a net gain for student education since professors can then be held accountable for failing their basic responsibility of teaching factual information to the best of their knowledge based on the available research in their field of study.
- dctoedt 3y agoHow often do your scenarios occur in real life?
- natpalmer1776 3y ago[deleted]
- drstewart 3y agoOops, you meant to reply to the parent comment. It's a mistake on your part, you may want to clarify.
- dctoedt 3y agoNo, I was responding to a comment that now starts out, "I'm tired ...."
- thebooktocome 3y agoIn the real world of academia, CRT is a legal theory, not a biological one.
- natpalmer1776 3y ago[deleted]
- thebooktocome 3y agoThe false positive rate for students reporting “my professor is teaching critical race theory!!!” is outlandishly high. CRT is also not “political pop science propaganda” so I’m not convinced you can recognize it either. It’s a legal theory. About law.
- natpalmer1776 3y ago[deleted]
- BuyMyBitcoins 3y agoFrom what I understand the tenure system was already in decline and it was already understood that getting tenure was effectively out of reach for the younger generations of professors.
- tombert 3y agoNot college, but my wife is wrapping up her teaching certification soon. We have both considered moving to Florida (we both have family that live there), but there is no chance in hell that we are moving to Florida and teaching; the infamous "Don't Say Gay" bill is so broad and idiotic (and she would be teaching biology), that Florida is a complete non-starter for us since neither of us really have any desire to be sued because some parent feels she might be teaching some "woke" agenda. I have no idea if my wife would be a good teacher, but I do know that if I were a teacher and I had options to teach elsewhere, I would not teach in Florida. Similarly, professors are kind of absurdly underpaid, at least in STEM. Generally if you're qualified to be a professor in STEM, you're qualified for a nice yuppie job paying twice as much; one of the very few appealing things that professorships have is tenure.
- nme01 3y agoI’m not from US but I’m curious what is the situation in other states? Are there situations like that occurring elsewhere (even if the bias is in the opposite political direction e.g. in California or somewhere) or is Florida a “lonely island” here with regard to free speech limitations on universities?
- thebooktocome 3y agoIt’s getting pretty common in conservative states. Just this year there were (in various states) hundreds of laws passed against public expressions of LGBTQ+ identities, including some that affect public sector employees (e.g., state university professors).
- csa 3y ago1. Imho, Florida is just leading the way for other states (many of which are actually more conservative than Florida). One reason Florida might be taking the lead is because the current governor is making a run for president in 2024, and this is establishing his bona fides. Florida is definitely not a “lonely island”. 2. Liberal states seem to be going extreme in other directions. Some examples are how “equity” policies (in general, not a bad idea) are implemented. Gifted programs, ap programs, accelerated programs and the like are being cut because the participants don’t have the proper racial ratios (Asians and Whites tend to be statistically over-represented). Equity is not an unreasonable policy to pursue, but doing it by holding back others is regressive, imho. Holding back high achievers also addresses the problem at the wrong level — that is, the origins of academic inequality typically happen at a much earlier age. Interestingly, in most states (blue, red, or purple), teachers are almost forced to teach to the bottom 25-30% of each class, since schools are evaluated by how many people meet the minimum standards rather than by overall or high level achievement.
- RhodesianHunter 3y agoCreating becomes an issue they can always pay more to compensate for the lack of possible tenure.
- edrxty 3y agoGetting rid of tenure is fine but they'll need to pay much more to stay competitive. The calculous is fairly simple. Tenure track and then have an easy work life but less money, or go to industry and make lots of money but work more. Nothing wrong with either but if you get rid of the upsides to academia expect to replace them with something. That's just how market economies work. The issue isn't stem so much as the stuff where there isn't a highly paying industry sector. Those PhDs will have to go out of state for the same QOL as there will be no other competition to increase pay.
- tombert 3y agoI find the likelihood of paying professors appropriately to be very unlikely; it's not like non-tenure-track professorships are making bank. I mean, it's not apples to apples, but I do part-time adjunct stuff in NYC, and the extra income is nice enough but even if I extrapolated it to full time, I'd barely have enough to pay my mortgage.
- kevinmchugh 3y agoAdjuncts get treated like dirt everywhere, afaik
- tombert 3y agoI mean, they treat me fine I think; everyone has been polite to me, I'm just a lecturer. It just doesn't pay well enough to survive. I mostly enjoy teaching, but honestly I don't think that I will be doing it again next semester. It's tough to say if I'm a "good" lecturer obviously, especially I think it's borderline impossible to fail a teaching evaluation here, but I do know that it's trivial for me to find work that pays more than twice as much in the private sector, without a ton of extra work.
- malshe 3y agoI think @kevinmchugh meant that the adjuncts are exploited everywhere.