2 ms·
yes to the second https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted/blob/23.4.0/docker-compose.yml#L199 https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted/blob/23.4.0/docker-... a
by mdaniel 4y ago
yes to the second https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted/blob/23.4.0/docker-compose.yml#L199 https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted/blob/23.4.0/docker-... and only after the embargo is over to the first: https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted/blob/23.4.0/LICENSE#L19 https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted/blob/23.4.0/LICENSE...
I also miss the "good old days" when running sentry was like 3 containers, not the 32 of modern Sentry
- tnolet 4y agoYeah, fair point. Sentry has added quite some features and increased complexity. Probably for good reasons like serving large customers. But still
- podoman 4y agofwiw, we don't really see a need for more than a handful of containers, even long term. we want to make it easy to self-host Highlight. nonetheless, sentry is a reputable project. they deserve the success they've had so far.