3 ms·
I contend it's a perfect analogy. Entity A decided to try thing to get things back from Entity B. Entity A did not think the plan through nearly well enough to
by king_magic 3y ago
I contend it's a perfect analogy. Entity A decided to try thing to get things back from Entity B.
Entity A did not think the plan through nearly well enough to possibly conclude that the action was unwise, attempted it anyway, and it went real bad real fast.
- rl3 3y agoI suppose it's just a bizarre choice in context of a nation's suitability to possess AI weapons. Everyone participating in that mission (including planning) knew it was a highly risky endeavor. It wasn't a nuclear first strike. In my opinion, the fact that another (even crazier) rescue mission was green-lit and worked up in the aftermath embodies the finest qualities of the United States. That said, I see your point. Things can look good enough to say "go" and it all goes to hell. Trying again isn't necessarily an option with AI. Unfortunately, given the state of current nuclear treaties, nonproliferation agreements or weapon bans for AI are probably already dead on arrival.