3 ms·
Basing laws off laws of another country isn't national continuity. The British didn't just accept the Declaration of Independence and remove their agents from t
by giantrobot 4y ago
Basing laws off laws of another country isn't national continuity. The British didn't just accept the Declaration of Independence and remove their agents from the US. The CCP wasn't formally recognized by the imperial government as the new government of China. There's no continuity of government in either case.
- shadowgovt 4y agoIt really depends on how one defines "nation" (which is kind of a modern and made-up concept).
- clouddrover 4y ago> "nation" (which is kind of a modern and made-up concept). It isn't. Learn your history.
- shadowgovt 4y agoI have, I recommend "Imagined Communities," by Benedict Anderson.
- clouddrover 4y agoI said history, not pseudo-intellectual pontificating theories of politics.
- shadowgovt 4y ago"Benedict Richard O'Gorman Anderson (August 26, 1936 – December 13, 2015) was an Anglo-Irish political scientist and historian who lived and taught in the United States." ~ (guess the source) With respect, between the work of a Cornell professor and an internet rando, I'm going to defer to the professor on the topic the professor wrote on.
- clouddrover 4y agoI said defer to history, not me.
- giantrobot 4y agoThe treaty of Westphalia would have a word about "modern".