4 ms·
I can’t really argue with that, good line of thought. See, my reaction has been, “perhaps our reasoning and actions are pretty much just a biologically-encoded
by b33j0r 4y ago
I can’t really argue with that, good line of thought.
See, my reaction has been, “perhaps our reasoning and actions are pretty much just a biologically-encoded statistical model too, it just doesn’t _feel_ that way because of some other factor.”
- mrtranscendence 4y agoWhen my wife tells me “you should call your mother”, I don’t think her brain assigned probabilities to “you should call your TV”, “you should call your xylophone”, “you should call your airplane”, etc, and then chose a suitable high-probability word (“mother”).
- drdeca 4y agoWould the natural analogy of “tokens” be “words”, or something more like, “portion of mouth-movement”?
- b33j0r 3y agoI more imagine someone speaking another language, when I break down written phonemes for tokenization purposes. As a native English speaker who grew up around code-switching Spanish speakers, I often heard speech that sounded really fast. But I was hearing “hay-un-a-al-pa-ca-per-si-gui-en-do-un tren-de-car-ga” I heard that as individual tokens, while my friends simply heard “¡There is an alpaca chasing that freight train!”
- zamnos 4y agoTalk so someone with aphasia or other brain disorder, or talk to a neurologist about it, and you'll see that's not quite the case. There really does seem to be a probability of saying TV when you meant to say "your mother", it's just that the language centers of our brains don't consciously calculate your probabilities and present them to our conscious mind.