4 ms·
That is factually incorrect: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/03/31/far-right-influencer-convicted-in-voter-suppression-scheme-00090042 https://www.politico.c
by myko 4y ago
That is factually incorrect: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/03/31/far-right-influencer-convicted-in-voter-suppression-scheme-00090042 https://www.politico.com/news/2023/03/31/far-right-influence...
- gadders 4y ago[flagged]
- mdp2021 4y agoYou are calling it a «meme», the judges recognized it as «fraudulent actions cross[ing] a line into criminality». The color does not count.
- mhoad 4y agoJust in case your not already aware this account you are responding to is very “out there” and hard to take in good faith. It’s just one thing after another of absolutely nonsense points like this.
- mdp2021 4y agoIn that case, dear Mhoad, let us hope that some calls to good sense sooner or later will find a fortunate moment and give the poster some clean sight.
- gadders 4y agoWhat a sheltered bubble you must live in to never come across anyone even vaguely right wing.
- myko 4y agoThe takes you have posted in this thread aren't moored to reality, and have nothing to do with left vs right wing. I hope these comments influence you to reevaluate things, but I am done engaging with you.
- gadders 4y agoIt has everything to do with it. I have posted from a pretty standard right wing perspective. Apparently you have so few people in your life that disagree with you politically that you can't even recognise this.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- infamouscow 4y agoI think you're forgetting some major facts about that case. FWIW, I'm not on the left or right. My comment history establishes that in spades.