I do not believe that is a reasonable threshold for AGI. If it were, I believe a significant % of humans would individually fail to meet the threshold of AGI.

I do not believe that is a reasonable threshold for AGI. If it were, I believe a significant % of humans would individually fail to meet the threshold of AGI. I wonder what your personal success rate would be if we did a Turing test with the “people” who “know basic facts about their field.” If they sat at a computer and asked you all these questions, would you get them right? Or would you end up in slide decks being held up as a reason why misnome doesn’t qualify as AGI? I find comfort in knowing that it can’t “do science.” There is a massive amount of stuff it can do. I’m hopeful there will be stuff left for humans. Maybe we’ll all be scientists in 10 years and I won’t have to waste my life on all this “basic coding” stuff.