5 ms·
Seems too good to be true, and I don't understand what it even means for an LLM to be unbiased.
by sebzim4500 4y ago
Seems too good to be true, and I don't understand what it even means for an LLM to be unbiased.
- hospitalJail 4y agoThey could use different models to test it. They could use common biases and test those.
- Turing_Machine 4y ago"Unbiased" almost always means "has biases that are similar to mine". I can't think of very many exceptions to that, frankly.
- flangola7 4y agoThat's obviously untrue after more than three seconds of critical thought
- __MatrixMan__ 4y agoIt's not obvious to me. If you have a proof that it's possible to have unbiased views of objective reality, please share it.
- sebzim4500 4y agoI've thought about it for four seconds now and I still agree with him. Maybe if you shared an example instead of a unsubstantiated put down it would help.
- henri18 4y agoThere are many bias detectors developed in the research world. To have a deeper look, you can look at this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.05777 https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.05777
- thfuran 4y agoOne with only weights and no biases in the ANN is unbiased.
- taneq 4y agoI feel like this went underappreciated. [b] = [0] indeed.
- sebzim4500 4y agoSomeone I know thought that LLaMA was unbiased because they 'read' the paper and clearly didn't know what anything meant. A great example of "a little knowledge is a dangerous thing".
- taneq 4y agoIt doesn't. Mean anything, I mean. Language isn't well defined, so its accuracy is also undefined and a non-uniform deviation from that accuracy is super undefined.