3 ms·
> If you’re laughing this thing off as generating unhelpful nonsense you’re going to get blind sided in the next few years as GPT gets wired into the workflows
by misnome 4y ago
> If you’re laughing this thing off as generating unhelpful nonsense you’re going to get blind sided in the next few years as GPT gets wired into the workflows at every layer of your stack.
Okay, now try being a scientist in a scientific field that isn't basic coding.
It's not people laughing at pretences, it's people who know even basic facts about their field literally looking at the output today and finding it deeply, fundamentally incorrect.
- r3trohack3r 4y agoI do not believe that is a reasonable threshold for AGI. If it were, I believe a significant % of humans would individually fail to meet the threshold of AGI. I wonder what your personal success rate would be if we did a Turing test with the “people” who “know basic facts about their field.” If they sat at a computer and asked you all these questions, would you get them right? Or would you end up in slide decks being held up as a reason why misnome doesn’t qualify as AGI? I find comfort in knowing that it can’t “do science.” There is a massive amount of stuff it can do. I’m hopeful there will be stuff left for humans. Maybe we’ll all be scientists in 10 years and I won’t have to waste my life on all this “basic coding” stuff.