4 ms·
OpenAI isn’t a multibillion profitable public company with many prior lost (some won) lawsuits. To some extent they didn’t have anything to loose by cutting cor
by bushbaba 4y ago
OpenAI isn’t a multibillion profitable public company with many prior lost (some won) lawsuits. To some extent they didn’t have anything to loose by cutting corners.
This is one of startups greatest advantages over established players.
- kmac_ 4y agoMicrosoft is a multibillion profitable public company and they managed to extend the search in no time. Google is not as effective as it could be. They have great engineering and they proved that many times, but something is not working on the product design side.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- rmbyrro 4y agoThis is such a lousy excuse on Google part. We see multi-billion public companies bringing bold innovative products to extremely regulated sectors, like pharmaceutical and medical devices. Google can't deploy a chatbot because of lawsuits? Oh, c'mon...
- svantana 4y agoHindsight is 20/20. Before ChatGPT, chatbots had a lousy track record. Pretty much any such project run by bigtech had been cancelled due to PR issues ("Tay" etc).
- htrp 4y agoMSFT got their fingers burned on Tay but were still willing to do a chatbot. Google didn't even bother despite having all the tech in place. and i can't believe I'm saying this but it seems microsoft has the ability to at least deliver innovation.