4 ms·
My issue with this take is that companies have used leverage and lobbying to get to define when a company isn't a single entity and when it is not, always in th
by bmitc 4y ago
My issue with this take is that companies have used leverage and lobbying to get to define when a company isn't a single entity and when it is not, always in their advantage. For example, a company is involved in a human death: the company is suddenly not a single entity and is instead simply part of this complex system of moving parts out of which emerged a human death. As another example, a corporation wants to donate to politicians (for "reasons"): the company is suddenly a single entity and even individual (!) who has constitutional rights to political donations.
Companies flip flop back and forth between them being a collective and individual at will and to their singular benefit.
- rickdeckard 4y ago1. Company is doing good --> Company is a single, good individual doing good 2. Company is doing bad --> Someone inside the company must have been bad, company would have prevented it but was powerless, because #1