3 ms·
Can I ask why you put “self hosted” and “web 1.0 design together” so tightly? I self host a blog, and several apps, which are modern and full of JavaScript. I
by erulabs 3y ago
Can I ask why you put “self hosted” and “web 1.0 design together” so tightly? I self host a blog, and several apps, which are modern and full of JavaScript.
I guess I’m not disagreeing - I also miss Web 1.0 - but combining the two seems like throwing the baby with the bath water. Can we have self hosted AND modern?
- helpfulclippy 3y agoI can't speak for the person you reply to, but for me, I get a certain easy, comfortable feeling when I see something that looks like a GOOD basic 90s site. I don't mean the stereotypical spinning GIFs and whatever -- but if I see thoughtfully-presented content using nothing more than the default font, blue links (purple if I cliked it!), maybe some <hr> tags to help with organization a bit, and I see "Last Updated: 2023-xx-xx", I feel like I'm in very good company. (but I do appreciate some effort to constrain the page margins. :) )
- dredmorbius 3y agoTextured background optional... Andrew Odlyzko's website is much in this style: <https://www-users.cse.umn.edu/~odlyzko/ https://www-users.cse.umn.edu/~odlyzko/> Hal Varian's UC Berkeley pages as well: <https://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~hal/people/hal/papers.html https://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~hal/people/hal/papers.h...> Both of those are highly info-dense to boot, and load near-instantly.