4 ms·
Is it not crazy, asks Mr Senior, that the piano maker is a productive worker, but not the piano player, although obviously the piano would be absurd without the
by kennyloginz 4y ago
Is it not crazy, asks Mr Senior, that the piano maker is a productive worker, but not the piano player, although obviously the piano would be absurd without the piano player? But this is exactly the case. The piano maker reproduces capital, the pianist only exchanges his labour for revenue. But doesn’t the pianist produce music and satisfy our musical ear, does he not even to a certain extent produce the latter? He does indeed: his labour produces some- thing; but that does not make it productive labour in the economic sense; no more than the labour of the mad man who produces delusions is productive.
— Karl Marx in Grundrisse (1857-61)
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> piano maker reproduces capital, the pianist only exchanges his labour for revenue Literally why we have intellectual property. So you can capitalize your intellectual work.