4 ms·

Presumably in response to this; https://petergabriel.com/news/diffusetogether-ai-video-contest-launches-today/ https://petergabriel.com/news/diffusetogether-ai-

• wpietri 3y ago
  Thanks, that's helpful. It seems to me that he's really missing some of the major concerns about "AI" as it stands today. As often happens with new technology, the old rules that secure rights don't quite fit anymore. E.g., if I were an artist who had spent years developing a unique, recognizable style, I'd be furious to have a for-profit company use my work to create something to imitate my art. It's probably not illegal at the moment, but it easily could be down the road, and it regardless raises real ethical questions. I'm disappointed to see Gabriel fail to grapple with that here, where his cache as a prominent artist is being used by a for-profit company for their own ends.
• matchagaucho 3y ago
  Yes. This is about the ethics of AI training data sources. Peter is OK with AI consuming his tracks. But other Artists... not so much.
  • deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]