3 ms·
There's something I don't understand. They're saying that two of the hex files were unreadable, due them either gibberish or being encrypted. But then they say
by bitshiftfaced 3y ago
There's something I don't understand. They're saying that two of the hex files were unreadable, due them either gibberish or being encrypted. But then they say he showed that this wasn't packet data. Was there something in the rules about these files being translatable to rtf? I don't understand how you can prove this isn't packet data if you can't even read the file.
- Brian_K_White 3y agoIf it's encrypted, or random, either way, it's not packet data. Encrypted data is no more proof or evidence than deleted or withheld or never-existed data. It might as well be an empty file with a note that says there is some data somewhere if you just knew the url to it. That would not constitute data itself, and neither does encrypted data.