So, please, play the scenario out. You take away all the legal guns... now what? Violence ends? Right? Right? What's the plan for taking away all the illegal g

So, please, play the scenario out. You take away all the legal guns... now what? Violence ends? Right? Right? What's the plan for taking away all the illegal guns? What's the plan to protect citizens that are now disarmed? Why don't we just focus on taking away all the illegal guns? Oh, right... we have been... for 89 years - yet there's more illegal guns on the streets today than in 1934. What a shock... Kind of like how there's more drugs readily available to average citizens than before the "war on drugs" started. It's literally an impossible task... have you seen the homemade guns in countries with outright bans? Or worse, illegally imported automatic firearms. Regular Joe - no gun. Criminal Joe, full auto! People like to point at Prohibition as evidence an outright ban of Drugs can never work. Yet, it's different with guns somehow? You're looking at an infected wound and deciding the appropriate treatment is duct tape. Why duct tape? Because you haven't bothered to even learn rudimentary medical knowledge but are a self-proclaimed expert. Duct tape holds things together, so why not? Banning guns means no gun violence, right? Why don't we just make it illegal to hurt or kill people? It's already illegal? Ok, make it double-illegal, that'll show them!