4 ms·

For us, a significant reason was the ClickHouse cloud-hosted offering, rather than having to manage a cluster ourselves. Their use of S3 as the backing storage

For us, a significant reason was the ClickHouse cloud-hosted offering, rather than having to manage a cluster ourselves. Their use of S3 as the backing storage medium means that large-scale data retention is quite affordable. A good comparison we've referenced: https://leventov.medium.com/comparison-of-the-open-source-olap-systems-for-big-data-clickhouse-druid-and-pinot-8e042a5ed1c7 https://leventov.medium.com/comparison-of-the-open-source-ol...

deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
dimitrios1 3y ago
When I was highly engaged with Imply (Druid) a few years ago, S3 was also used as a backing storage. Is this not the case anymore?
grumblestumble 3y ago
For reference, Apache Druid has an equivalent in Imply Polaris, and Apache Pinot has an equivalent in Startree. I can't speak for Startree, but Polaris similarly uses S3 for backing.
metahunter 3y ago
I think both Pinot and Druid nowadays offer cloud-hosted solutions. Maybe you started early that only ClickHouse had that offering. Is cloud hosting the only reason you guys choose Clickhouse? I am also wondering is it possible to let users choose the data source?