3 ms·
Sure, it's not naive just because it sounds naive. It's naive for other reasons (for one thing, we're really no closer to super-intelligent AIs than we were bef
by mrtranscendence 4y ago
Sure, it's not naive just because it sounds naive. It's naive for other reasons (for one thing, we're really no closer to super-intelligent AIs than we were before the LLM craze began).
- cubefox 4y agoA lot of people would disagree with that. You can hardly deny that progress has sped up in the last few years, so I don't know why we shouldn't extrapolate this speed into the coming years.